I was recently shown this format and I think it's fantastic. I'm moving all my flows to this Action naming approach:
Format: <Original OOTB name of the Action> | <Verb on Noun>
Also, see my Flow tips here
I was recently shown this format and I think it's fantastic. I'm moving all my flows to this Action naming approach:
Format: <Original OOTB name of the Action> | <Verb on Noun>
Also, see my Flow tips here
My Format (I simplify for smaller companies)
<Company>-<BusinessUnit>-<Region>-<Environment>-<ResourceType>-<Project>-<Instance>
GS-IT-UK-PR-RGP-Treetops-001
GS-HR-US-DV-NSG-Cloud-001
I like to enforce the same length for each part, just because it makes it easier to read in a list. i.e. Region - Could be the 2 digit country code. Case consistency is also important.
Environment is my DTAP environment i.e. DV = Development, TS = Test, AS = Acceptance, PR=Production
Resource Type is the Azure Resource Type e.g. Network Security Group = NSG. It is worth publishing a list as application services could be app or aps.
Tip: In azure sometime you can't use hyphens or need to use lowercase. If I am forced, then I keep the same convention but merely abide by the rules of the service.
The key is just keep it consistent. I find organisation use Tags poorly so with the naming convention, it helps replace the need for Tags or tags can easily be added as it gives the info away in the name.
Microsoft Recommends Azure naming convention:
![]() |
Preferred High Level Design I like for Web API projects |
URL/Resource | GET (read) | POST (create) | PUT (Update) | DELETE (Delete) |
/customers | List all customers | Add/created a new customer | Bulk update customers | Bulk Delete or Generally error and don’t implement |
/customers/35 | Get a specific customer. Customer 35 is John Doe | NA | Update the John Doe record | Delete the John Doe object/record |
GET | Return the current value of an object | |
PUT | Replace or update an object | |
DELETE | Delete an object | |
POST | Create a new object. Return 201 for created and 202 for long running operations. |